[SECURITY] [DSA 5536-1] chromium security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5536-1 [email protected]
https://www.debian.org/security/ Andres Salomon
October 26, 2023 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : chromium
CVE ID : CVE-2023-5472
An important security issue was discovered in Chromium, which could result
in the execution of arbitrary code, denial of service or information
disclosure.
For the oldstable distribution (bullseye), this problem has been fixed
in version 118.0.5993.117-1~deb11u1.
For the stable distribution (bookworm), this problem has been fixed in
version 118.0.5993.117-1~deb12u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your chromium packages.
For the detailed security status of chromium please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/chromium
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: [email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Gmlo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: