[SECURITY] [DSA 5560-1] strongswan security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5560-1 [email protected]
https://www.debian.org/security/ Yves-Alexis Perez
November 20, 2023 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : strongswan
CVE ID : CVE-2023-41913
Florian Picca reported a bug the charon-tkm daemon in strongSwan an IKE/IPsec
suite.
The TKM-backed version of the charon IKE daemon (charon-tkm) doesn't
check the length of received Diffie-Hellman public values before copying
them to a fixed-size buffer on the stack, causing a buffer overflow that
could potentially be exploited for remote code execution by sending a
specially crafted and unauthenticated IKE_SA_INIT message.
For the oldstable distribution (bullseye), this problem has been fixed
in version 5.9.1-1+deb11u4.
For the stable distribution (bookworm), this problem has been fixed in
version 5.9.8-5+deb12u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your strongswan packages.
For the detailed security status of strongswan please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/strongswan
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: [email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=xq5Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: