[SECURITY] [DSA 5708-1] cyrus-imapd security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5708-1 [email protected]
https://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
June 11, 2024 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : cyrus-imapd
CVE ID : CVE-2024-34055
Damian Poddebniak discovered that the Cyrus IMAP server didn't restrict
memory allocation for some command arguments which may result in denial
of service. This update backports new config directives which allow to
configure limits, additional details can be found at:
https://www.cyrusimap.org/3.6/imap/download/release-notes/3.6/x/3.6.5.html
These changes are too intrusive to be backported to the version of
Cyrus in the oldstable distribution (bullseye). If the IMAP server is used
by untrusted users an update to Debian stable/bookworm is recommended.
In addition the version of cyrus-imapd in bullseye-backports will be
updated with a patch soon.
For the stable distribution (bookworm), this problem has been fixed in
version 3.6.1-4+deb12u2.
We recommend that you upgrade your cyrus-imapd packages.
For the detailed security status of cyrus-imapd please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/cyrus-imapd
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: [email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=rPUU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: