[SECURITY] [DSA 5734-1] bind9 security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5734-1 [email protected]
https://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso
July 25, 2024 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : bind9
CVE ID : CVE-2024-0760 CVE-2024-1737 CVE-2024-1975 CVE-2024-4076
Several vulnerabilities were discovered in BIND, a DNS server
implementation, which may result in denial of service.
To mitigate CVE-2024-1737 two new configuration statements have been
added to allow operators of secondary servers and recursive resolvers to
set an upper bound on the growth of data in their zones or caches.
Details can be found at:
https://kb.isc.org/docs/rrset-limits-in-zones
For the oldstable distribution (bullseye), these problems have been
fixed in version 1:9.16.50-1~deb11u1. For the oldstable distribution
(bullseye) the limits to mitigate CVE-2024-1737 are hardcoded and not
configurable.
For the stable distribution (bookworm), these problems have been fixed in
version 1:9.18.28-1~deb12u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your bind9 packages.
For the detailed security status of bind9 please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/bind9
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: [email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=v+ir
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: